the bogus solution – issues with systems of carbon trading #1

As I raised yesterday, one of the key issues I have with emissions trading schemes is their heavy link to the sequestration capability of the adapting nation.

Sequestration is likely to play a significant role in Australia’s efforts to reduce net national emissions. Our capacity could be greatly increased through the rehabilitation of degraded land and the reduction of tillage in agricultural systems, but as Professor Peter Grace from the Institute for Sustainable Resources points out actually profiting from sequestration in Australia would be exceptionally difficult. Our high temperatures and limited rainfall limits biomass production, reducing the ability of our agricultural systems to accumulate carbon. “Realistically we could never reach the capabilities of the US with their cooler and wetter environments” Grace says.

Carbon trading systems based heavily on sequestration are therefore not a reasonable solution for Australia. We need to focus on other management strategies if we really want to address the issue of global warming.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s